EM RESUMO A PASSEATA É O ANSEIO DA POPULAÇÃO POR UM
PLEITO À REFORMA DO
SISTEMA POLÍTICO
Por isso, sugerimos um Novo Regime Político,
que foi batizado de
SOCIETOCRÁTICO REPUBLICANO
e que tem que ser amplo e irrestrito.
Para uma boa visualização e
entendimento seguem alguns links que darão uma ideia do que se trata e como
pode ser implantado. Esta sugestão atual de consultar a população brasileira por
meio de um plebiscito, não levará a nada. Pois a maioria nuca tem razão, acerta
por acaso. Acertou fazer a manifestação, mas jamais tem competência e
capacidade de saber escolher a melhor solução. E depois o sistema de computação
dos votos nas urnas eletrônicas não merece confiança. Quem tem que presentar a
sugestão para o bem da Classe Média, de base consumista moderada, no conjunto
financeiro-econômico do Capitalismo Policiado, são estudiosos de mais de 65 anos por já possuírem a Sabedoria da Vida
Prática, fora das Universidade e possuidores de elevado grau de Altruísmo.
Temos que pedir licença aos Conservadores das
Religiões, das Forças Armadas, dos Patronais, dos Proletários, dos Funcionários
Públicos, ...... , mantendo nossos compromissos Internacionais e respeitando a
participação das Transnacionais, com um profundo ardor Patriótico e de
Nacionalismo moderado, em uma Nova Estrutura de Organização do Estado, acoplada
a uma Nova Conjuntura Nacional e participante da Globalização Econômica vigente.
Salpicar de Informações:
http://www.doutrinadahumanidade.com/Palestra%20AMAN%20IV%20[Compatibility%20Mode].pdf (Slide 39 até o final)
Vasculhem todos os links
Em colaboração à ONU, segue um Comentário do
autor deste artigo sugerido o sistema Societocrático Republicano.
http://blogs.cfr.org/patrick/2013/06/05/global-development-2-0-assessing-a-new-un-roadmap/#more-3243
Estamos preparando uma Minuta de Uma
Constituição Societocrática Republicana para fazer frente a esta necessidade atual, cujo Preâmbulo segue:
Atenciosamente, desejo a todos,
Saúde, com respeito e Fraternidade,
Paulo Augusto Lacaz
www.doctrineofhumanity.com http://www.avaaz.org/po/petition/MUDAR_o_REGIME_Democratico_para_o_SOCIETOCRATICO/?launch
CALLING ON THE NAME OF THE LORD
ResponderExcluirCALLING ON THE NAME OF THE LORD?
What is the meaning of calling on the name of the Lord? Many assume that believing in Jesus and saying a form of a sinner's prayer constitutes, calling on the name of the Lord. The problem with that theory is none of the conversions under the New Covenant support that assumption. Not one time is anyone ever told to believe and say the sinner's prayer in order to be saved.
The apostle Peter on the Day of Pentecost quoted the prophet Joel, Acts 2:21 And it shall come to pass that whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved." (NKJV)
The apostle Peter preached the first gospel sermon under the New Covenant. Peter did not tell the 3000 converts to believe and say the sinner's prayer.
Peter preached the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. He preached Jesus as both Lord and Christ. When they heard this they asked Peter and the rest of the brethren what they should do?(Acts 2:22-37) Peter told them what to do. Acts 2:38 Peter said to them, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.(NKJV)
How did the 3000 on the Day of Pentecost call on the name of the Lord and become saved?
1. They believed that Jesus was both Lord and Christ.
2. They believed that God raised Jesus from the grave.
3. They repented. Repentance is a change of heart. Repentance means to be converted so that God may forgive your sins. Repentance is to make the intellectual commitment to turn from sin and turn toward God. (Acts 3:19, Acts 2:38)
4. They were immersed in water (baptized) so that their sins could be forgiven.
How did the 3000 on the Day of Pentecost not call on the name of the Lord?
1. They did not say a sinner's prayer.
2. Not one person was asked to pray for forgiveness.
3. Not one single man was told to be baptized as a testimony of his faith.
4. No one was told that water baptism was a just an act of obedience.
5. No one was informed they were saved the very minute they believed.
6. Not one person was told that water baptism was not essential for the forgiveness of sins.
7. Not one person was told to be baptized so they could join a denominational church.
Jesus said he that believes and is baptized shall be saved. (Mark 16"16) Jesus did not say he who believes and says a sinner's prayer shall be saved.
YOU ARE INVITED TO READ MY BLOG POSTINGS ___Steve Finnell-a christian view
Posted by Steve Finnell at 9:07 AM No comments: